Weak TLS_DHE_RSA_WITH_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA
- IANA name:
- TLS_DHE_RSA_WITH_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA
- OpenSSL name:
- DHE-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA
- GnuTLS name:
- TLS_DHE_RSA_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA1
- Hex code:
- 0x00, 0x16
- TLS Version(s):
- TLS1.0, TLS1.1, TLS1.2, TLS1.3
- Protocol:
- Transport Layer Security (TLS)
- Key Exchange:
- PFS Diffie-Hellman Ephemeral (DHE)
- Authentication:
- Rivest Shamir Adleman algorithm (RSA)
- Encryption:
- Triple-DES (Encrypt Decrypt Encrypt) in Cipher Block Chaining mode (3DES EDE CBC)
- Hash:
- HMAC Secure Hash Algorithm 1 (SHA)
- Included in RFC:
- Machine-readable:
- application/json
The so-called DHEat Attack affects cryptographic protocols using the Diffie Hellman key exchange (incl. TLS). According to its authors, it exploits a potocol particularity that may allow attackers to perform a DoS attack "with a low-bandwidth network connection without authentication, privilege, or user interaction."
The so-called Raccoon Attack affects the specifications of TLS 1.2 and below when using a DH(E) key exchange. According to the researchers, while very hard to exploit, in rare circumstances this timing attack allows attackers to decrypt the connection between users and the server. A fix has been introduced in the TLS 1.3 specification.
There are reports that servers using the RSA authentication algorithm with keys longer than 3072-bit may experience heavy performance issues leading to connection timeouts and even service unavailability if many clients open simultaneous connections.
In 2013, researchers demonstrated a timing attack against several TLS implementations using the CBC encryption algorithm (see isg.rhul.ac.uk). Additionally, the CBC mode is vulnerable to plain-text attacks in TLS 1.0, SSL 3.0 and lower. A fix has been introduced with TLS 1.2 in form of the GCM mode which is not vulnerable to the BEAST attack. GCM should be preferred over CBC.
While Triple-DES is still recognized as a secure symmetric-key encryption, a more and more standardizations bodies and projects decide to deprecate this algorithm. Though not broken, it has been proven to suffer from several vulnerabilities in the past (see sweet32.info).
The Secure Hash Algorithm 1 has been proven to be insecure as of 2017 (see shattered.io).